What do opponents of the electoral college argue about voter weighting?

Opponents of the electoral college often point out that votes carry different significance depending on the state due to the way the electoral system is structured. In this system, smaller states have disproportionately more influence in the electoral process because every state is allocated a minimum of three electoral votes regardless of population. This means that a vote in a less populous state can carry more weight in the overall electoral count than a vote in a more populous state, leading to an inequitable distribution of power.

This argument highlights the fact that not all votes contribute equally to the final outcome of a presidential election. As a result, voters in states with fewer electoral votes might feel that their votes are more impactful than those in larger states, which can lead to a misrepresentation of the actual popular support for candidates across the country. This imbalance makes the case against the electoral college, focusing on the inequalities and discrepancies in how votes are represented and counted in the presidential election process.